Mississippi lottery committee plans final meeting

Oct 29, 2017, 9:26 am (7 comments)

Mississippi Lottery

JACKSON, Miss. — What is expected to be the final meeting of House Speaker Philip Gunn's lottery study committee is scheduled for Nov. 16 at the Mississippi Capitol.

Gunn formed the study committee in April in response to efforts in the House to pass lottery legislation.

After the November meeting, the plan is for legislative staff to compile the information garnered by the nine-member committee into a report to be presented to the Mississippi House before the 2018 session starts in January. The study committee, as its chairman Rep. Richard Bennett, R-Long Beach, had said from the beginning, will not take a position on whether the state should have a lottery.

Whether that report leads to Mississippi enacting a lottery remains to be seen.

"I believe it will come up (during the 2018 session) one way or another," said Rep. Mac Huddleston, R-Pontotoc, one of two Northeast Mississippians appointed to the study committee by the speaker. "I don't know how far it will get. I am sure someone will introduce a bill.

"I think it is gaining some favor."

Whether it has gained enough favor to pass the two chambers of the Legislature remains to be seen. Both Huddleston, and Rep. Nick Bain, D-Corinth, the other Northeast Mississippian on the study panel, say they still oppose the state enacting a lottery.

Bain conceded that a majority of Mississippians probably want to enact a lottery, but he said he remains convinced enacting a lottery is bad policy for the state for a number of reasons.

At the Nov. 16 meeting, the members are slated to hear from groups opposed to the lottery, as well as those who support it.

Members also are expected to hear more information on the potential economic impact of a lottery on Mississippi.

Mississippi is one of six states without a lottery. Many people contend that the state is losing a significant amount of money because of Mississippians traveling to neighboring states – Tennessee, Arkansas and Louisiana – to purchase lottery tickets.

During trips to Louisiana and Arkansas to study their lottery operations, members of the study committee said they were told stores in those states near the border with Mississippi are some of their busiest.

During the past two years there has been growing momentum for Mississippi to enact a lottery. Gov. Phil Bryant, who once opposed the lottery, has "evolved" on the issue and has voiced support for a lottery – perhaps to help pay for transportation needs.

Attorney General Jim Hood, Mississippi's lone statewide elected Democrat, seems poised to make enacting a lottery part of a possible gubernatorial campaign in 2019.

"I'm a Baptist. You know us Baptist don't believe in gambling...," Hood said during the summer to the Neshoba County Fair crowd at the annual political speakings.

"But I have to be a realist. The Legislature is not passing any revenue (tax increase). That (lottery revenue) is money available for education – should be spent on education."

In the 2016 session, the House approved amendments on bills on two separate occasions to enact a lottery. Those proposals died later in the process.

Speaker Gunn has expressed his opposition to the lottery and the Senate's presiding officer Lt. Gov. Tate Reeves also has been reluctant to voice support for a lottery, saying a lottery does not provide the jobs that casino gambling does.

Bain said the biggest surprise to him is learning through the study committee the costs of a lottery. He said Arkansas generates more than $400 million annually in ticket sales, but that results in only about $85 million in revenue for the state.

In the early 1990s, Mississippians voted to remove the prohibition on a lottery from the state Constitution. But the Legislature did not enact a lottery after that vote.

At the time, a majority of Northeast Mississippi counties opposed removing the constitutional prohibition.

Daily Journal

Comments

music*'s avatarmusic*

 In the early 1990s, Mississippians voiced their support for a lottery. Why can they not vote for it Statewide? 

 The truth about a lottery funding education should be told. It has little effect on the whole budget for education. It helps a little but only a little.

 At least the funds will not be going down the black hole of general funding of government. 

 Arkansas might have a lot of winners and that is where the other $315 million is going. 

US Flag

CDanaT's avatarCDanaT

If Miss. does accept their idea to be involved with a state lottery to include PB/MM...... Think we might see an increase of odds in both of those games ????

I know when I go to other states to visit or pass through when traveling, I do stop and pick up a scratcher or 2 and a PB/MM ticket. (Except - CA/OR/WA/NY/NJ/CT/MA)

music*'s avatarmusic*

When Mississippians look Westward and see a winning ticket in Power Ball worth $191 million won in Louisiana they must feel something. Do they feel left out? It could have been won in Mississippi!!

 Could the winner be from Mississippi who was traveling across State lines to play PB? 

 Patriot

Bleudog101

Quote: Originally posted by CDanaT on Oct 29, 2017

If Miss. does accept their idea to be involved with a state lottery to include PB/MM...... Think we might see an increase of odds in both of those games ????

I know when I go to other states to visit or pass through when traveling, I do stop and pick up a scratcher or 2 and a PB/MM ticket. (Except - CA/OR/WA/NY/NJ/CT/MA)

What's wrong with playing lottery in my home state of Massachusetts?  They have tons of winners there!

Ron5995

In my view, it comes down to protecting casino revenue. Simple as that. On a related note, Mississippi has many more casinos than I thought. Seems over-saturated already, which, presumably, compounds the fear of the casino industry has towards losing even a little revenue to a new MS lottery.

Another consideration, as pointed out in the article, is the operating costs of a lottery verses profit isn't as big as many would imagine for a low population, economically challenged state like Mississippi.

Personally, while I'm generally all for lotteries, it seems prudent for Mississippi to be cautious not cannibalizing their casino tax revenue for a lottery without in-depth study. Based on a quick search, it appears Mississippi took in nearly $1 billion in casino tax revenue this past year. That far exceeds expected lottery profit, which would likely be in the $100 million or so range at best.

In my view, a good compromise would be for Mississippi to offer an in-state and/or regional lottery jackpot game along with Powerball and Mega Millions. Maybe offer some Pick-X games too, but absolutely no instant scratch off tickets. The play style of many regular instant ticket players is similar to that of casino players; more likely to impact casino revenue verses offering numbers games only.

CDanaT's avatarCDanaT

Quote: Originally posted by Bleudog101 on Oct 30, 2017

What's wrong with playing lottery in my home state of Massachusetts?  They have tons of winners there!

Nothing as far as I know. I just don't go to those states   Smiley

music*'s avatarmusic*

I have just learned that Mississippi is the least expensive State to retire in. Hawaii and CA are the first and second most expensive. 

Bed

End of comments
Subscribe to this news story